tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6371869226918137688.post3339229568962758682..comments2023-11-15T02:33:37.285-06:00Comments on A Traditional Catholic in Iowa: Both/And...Either/Or...Again...Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03009356356243871772noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6371869226918137688.post-87048275007633895482012-01-09T10:51:17.822-06:002012-01-09T10:51:17.822-06:00Thanks Joe...it is a clear exposition of the herme...Thanks Joe...it is a clear exposition of the hermeneutic of rupture which dominates Holy Mother Church today!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03009356356243871772noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6371869226918137688.post-82051339683921108552012-01-06T21:12:13.810-06:002012-01-06T21:12:13.810-06:00100% with you on this...100% with you on this...Православный физикhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11313371333531421128noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6371869226918137688.post-21449028241259747132012-01-04T12:42:26.597-06:002012-01-04T12:42:26.597-06:00Hello Joan,
Yes, I am. I think that Fr. Cekada&#...Hello Joan,<br /><br />Yes, I am. I think that Fr. Cekada's critique is spot on! In this instance I've laid aside his position on St. Peter and I've read his work from a historical/critical view. I couldn't ask for a better look at the Novus Ordo. Everything that Fr. Cekada says about the Novus Ordo is accurate. At no point does he, in the writing, expclictly state that the Novus Ordo is invalid, because he doesn't need to. The flaws are enough to warrant caution or even downright avoidance, unless absolutely necessary.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03009356356243871772noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6371869226918137688.post-90487264644607716392012-01-04T11:48:56.705-06:002012-01-04T11:48:56.705-06:00You must be familiar with "Work of Human Hand...You must be familiar with "Work of Human Hands."<br />http://www.youtube.com/user/workofhumanhandsjoanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14163855804754963521noreply@blogger.com